User talk:Shallom adepoju

Welcome

Hello Shallom adepoju and welcome to {{See above.}}Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 16:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello its my 1st time Shallom adepoju (talk) 16:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You VViking I love you! Shallom adepoju (talk) 22:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. VViking_TalkEdits 16:17, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok Shallom adepoju (talk) 16:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. _signed,Willondon (talk) 16:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok can I be the editor of the day Shallom adepoju (talk) 21:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes Shallom B Adepoju (talk) 22:49, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 11:22, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|because its not fair Shallom adepoju (talk) 23:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Shallom adepoju (talk) 23:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@yamala unblock me Shallom adepoju (talk) 23:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shallom adepoju (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

because not fair

Decline reason:

Obvious sockpuppetry - see Shallom B Adepoju (talk · contribs). PhilKnight (talk) 04:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.