User talk:TDFan2006/archive4

Rollback

Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:

Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Noggin and Nick Jr., you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Franklin the Turtle and Little Bear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BBC One

Hiya,
Sorry for the revert - When you split the BBC one article - the BBC history link was still red so assumed you were just blanking!
So apologies for reverting!
Regards -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 12:59, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Really, don't worry. Everybody including me makes mistakes. The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 13:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Links.on BBC one page

What are the dead links on the BBC one page. Please either provide a list of them on the BBC one talk page OR, this is very important, add a tag to the link to highlight. --Crazyseiko (talk) 10:38, 30 March 2014 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Linkrot Do not delete cited information solely because the URL to the source does not work any longer. WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published online.[reply]

Info

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

BBC One issues

Hiya @TDFan2006:,
What are you having trouble with ? as perhaps I can take you to the right board or even better hopefully get the issue resolved :),
If you have any questions let me know or you can simply visit either the Help desk or the Teahouse
Thanks,
Regards -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 12:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't think I need help. I just think that the History sections are too long. I spent around fifteen minutes reading the history of BBC One. I think pages should only take around five minutes to read. I think the other lad / lassy is just being uptight over it. The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 18:40, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

McDonald's

Hi there. I noticed you added multiple tags to the McDonald's article. Are you sure you tagged the right article? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. I added Unreliable Sources because it had Dead Links. We would never know if it'd be reliable in the first place. The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 05:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's not required, but it would be great if you could leave a note on the talk page with some of your specific concerns. For example, which section did you find to have intricate detail? Thanks again. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FanforClarl. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:45, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No Way! I Can't Believe This! listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect No Way! I Can't Believe This!. Since you had some involvement with the No Way! I Can't Believe This! redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:05, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can't. I have been blocked because everybody thinks I've been socking when I haven't. The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 23:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. In that case, in the event that this redirect gets deleted as a result of this discussion, and you feel that it should be reinstated, after your block has been lifted, I would recommend bringing it up at Wikipedia:Deletion review. If the redirect gets recreated without going through this process, it could be eligible for speedy deletion per criterion G4. Steel1943 (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]