User talk:Themr tairq

Your unconstructive edits on Ibn Taymiyyah

I know that he's a somewhat controversial figure, but doing an automated search-and-replace which replaces all occurrences of the word "Muslim" with "Khawarjee" is really not the answer to anything. The usual English spelling is actually "Kharijite" anyway... AnonMoos (talk) 19:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Themr tairq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:17, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your hostile additions of "Najdi", "Khariji", etc. to Ehsan Ilahi Zahir

Please refrain from adding insulting terms such as "Najdi", etc. to articles about figures you do not like, as you did in Ehsan Ilahi Zahir. This is POV, and not conducive to writing a proper encyclopedia. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deobandi

Please do not make changes to articles that directly contradict the sources in those articles. If you have reliable sources that dispute that Deobandi are a part of Sunni Islam, we can discuss how to add those sources and the claim that their categorization is disputed. You may not just make changes based on your own personal opinion. Please go to the Talk: Deobandi to discuss the issue and provide your sources. If you do not have any sources, you must immediately stop your changes. Note that continuing to add false/unverified claims to articles can result in you being blocked for disruptive editing. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to Deobandi do not meet Wikipedia's core policies requiring neutrality and forbidding original research. If you do not stop, you may be blocked from editing. Furthermore, you are edit warring to keep the page these changes. Once editors have expressed disagreement with your edits, especially when those edits appear to blatantly contradict policy, you must stop making them, and instead discuss on the talk page. Wikipedia is not a place for you to soapbox about your personal opinions. If you cannot edit neutrally and collaboratively, you cannot edit on Wikipedia. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, a smaller note--never mark changes in content as "minor" changes--that may only be used for things like spelling or minor grammar changes. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Continued POV vandalism on Islamic articles

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wahhabi, you may be blocked from editing. Your continued vandalism of articles on groups/people you disagree with is becoming very disruptive. You have made multiple edits labelling people as "Wahhabi" and "Khawarijee", as well as inserting the term "Shaytan" (Satan) into the Arabic name of the founder of Wahhabism. These edits are completely inappropiate, and further vandalism will be cited to justify blocking or banning your account. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note this user also vandalised Jamiat Ahle Hadith, Abul Ala Maududi, Ehsan Ilahi Zahir, etc. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this a final warning. You are not editing Wikipedia from a neutral point of view. I believe that every or nearly every change you've made so far has been reverted. Wikipedia is not a place for you to add your own opinions about other religions (or anything for that matter). You are deliberately and intentionally trying altering the meaning and wording of Muslim groups with which you disagree to imply or even outright state that they are evil. You are treating Wikipedia like a battleground and intentionally introducing POV into articles, and this must stop. Since we cannot allow the continued disruption, if you are unwilling to edit according to our policies and guidelines, you will be blocked. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism block requested

Due to your ongoing vandalism, recently again vandalising Ahl al-Hadith, Wahhabi, and Ahle Sunnat Wal Jama'at, as well as your ongoing refusal to explain your edits, I've requested your account be blocked. Your edits have also all been reverted in a matter of minutes. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing and failure to discuss contentious changes on talk pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of modern-day Muslim scholars. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 17:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a final warning--you are repeating the same type of POV pushing without reference to any sources that got you blocked last time (on Ibtisam Elahi Zaheer and Wahhabi. If you continue to make such changes without 1) discussing them on the articles' talk pages and 2) providing proper reliable sources, you will be blocked again, and this time the block will be for longer. If you are incapable of editing from a neutral point of view, then this just isn't the website for you. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of honorifics and insulting language at List of modern-day Muslim scholars

Greetings, at List of modern-day Muslim scholars your edits today added POV honorifics to Barelvi scholars, and retitled the "non-Barelvi" section with a variety of insulting religious terms. Both these edits were inappropriate and non-WP, so they have been reverted. Please discontinue your practice of making such edits, as it is disruptive. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:53, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated disruption in spite of past warnings, failure to heed past warnings, and refusing to discuss controversial edits. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:10, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]