User talk:Thucyd
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Please make a greater effort to form consensus on talk pages
[edit]It would be nice if you made more of an effort to help gather community consensus on talk pages, instead of constantly editing articles the way you want them to read when you know there is a dispute and making me repeatedly go through all the effort of trying to gather community consensus. If you want to add disputed material to an article, the burden is on you to get consensus. Please see Wikipedia:Consensus. --PluniaZ (talk) 03:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Again, am I missing something or is your closure here not a clear violation of Closing discussions? Jzsj (talk) 20:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Important standard notification
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
--Neutralitytalk 17:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Reinstating challenged content
[edit]Please don't reinstate content that has been challenged by other editors on a ground of Wikipedia policy. You've now done so three times. Please see WP:ONUS, WP:CONSENSUS, WP:EW for guidance. Neutralitytalk 23:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)