User talk:Tracibaby10
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lewis Edgerton, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
- and you must always:
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.
Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked indefinitely without further warning.
For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. --Dynaflow babble 10:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Commercial use of Image:Paps 1.JPG
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Paps 1.JPG, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Paps 1.JPG is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Paps 1.JPG, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Duplicate images uploaded
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Lewis Edgerton.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Lewis Edgerton.jpg. The copy called Image:Lewis Edgerton.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 07:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Duplicate Image:Lewis Edgerton 1.jpg
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Lewis Edgerton 1.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Lewis Edgerton 1.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Lewis Edgerton 1.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. shoeofdeath 09:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
The problem with the Lewis Edgerton article
[edit]Wikipedia "coverage" is, with rare exception, post-facto, as per the guidelines in WP:NOTE and its subsection, WP:BIO. Also, you are contravening WP:COI something fierce, though I'll give you credit for being straightforward about it. As the article's subject does not, at this time, seem to satisfy WP's notability guidelines, the the WP entry will have to wait until your mission meets success on other fronts. You may want to avoid creating or editing the article even then, though, as you seem to have a conflict of interest in this case which might cause others to cast an extremely critical eye on whatever edits make. If the subject does indeed become notable, you can rest assured that someone else will create the article for you. If you have any questions on this, leave me a message on my Talk page (just click "babble"). --Dynaflow babble 10:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Lewis Edgerton. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Deor 18:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Maya medhist
[edit]A tag has been placed on Maya medhist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Deor 11:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Lewis Edgerton May 2007.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Lewis Edgerton May 2007.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Lewis Edgerton May 2007.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
May 2007.
[edit] Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kate Moss. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Acalamari 19:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
