User talk:Wikipedia.pk
Hello, Wikipedia.pk. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Pooja Khatri, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Pooja Khatri to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks, Gmaildamn (talk) 14:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pooja Khatri
[edit]The article Pooja Khatri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:BASIC with no secondary sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 16:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia.pk, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Wikipedia.pk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Naypta (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 5 September 2015 (UTC) |
Nomination of Pooja Khatri for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pooja Khatri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooja Khatri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 02:24, 13 October 2015 (UTC)