User talk:Wo.luren

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Wo.luren, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 18:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Foxit_PDF_Editor listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Foxit_PDF_Editor. Since you had some involvement with the Foxit_PDF_Editor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Affinemesh94464 (talk) 07:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Notice of redirect discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mi2 console

The article Mi2 console has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article moved

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wo.luren (talk) 14:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions of redirects?

Hi. I've noticed that you've been proposing the deletion of redirects. Why are you doing this? It makes the redirects fail to work, and most of the time, there's no reason to delete them. Please enlighten me. --Tanner Swett (talk) 18:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wo.luren. You have new messages at Tanner Swett's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Wo.luren. You have new messages at Eraserhead1's talk page.
Message added 22:44, 22 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Three hares

I am writing to you in the hope that you might have some expertise that I lack. I picked your name out at random from contributors to the Chinaarticle. If you would kindly take a look at the Further Reading section of this article, I could use your assistance. Specifically, there are a number of augthori's names that need to be alphabetized. I do not know which are surnames and which are first names. Thank you and happy editing. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 00:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Thank you for your help. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 22:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Stan[reply]

It is very kind of you. But I have not done the work yet as I am really busy these days. The last entry of further reading section remains to be identified. I will check it tomorrow :) Wo.luren (talk) 16:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which only highlights the problem that I had in the first place. Because I am primarily an English only speaker (with some French, too), and speak no Chinese or any of its many dialects, I have to take your word for what you have (and haven't) done so far. Thank you for helping out; the article will be improved with your intervention, I have no doubt. Merci. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Youku

Hi! I caught this edit summary: it says: "The detail for contact should not be here"

That is not correct, sir. That "detail for contact" (only the building name, if applicable, the floor on that building, if stated, the city name, and the country) should be there for every country. The non-notable details (exact address, driving directions) are included in citations WhisperToMe (talk) 06:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your notification. I have merged that information into the infobox according to those articles like YouTube and Google.Wo.luren (talk) 18:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 3 articles "List of mobile phones with (HD, FWVGA, WVGA) display" for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles List of mobile phones with HD display, List of mobile phones with FWVGA display, and List of mobile phones with WVGA display are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The articles are being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mobile phones with HD display until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. You are receiving this because you contributed to one of those articles. Votes are indicated by adding to the bottom of the AfD page one of:
*'''Keep''' Your comment ~~~~
*'''Delete''' Your comment ~~~~
Some comment as to why you feel one way or the other is desirable. Your participation is encouraged. Makyen (talk) 23:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wo.luren. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wo.luren. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wo.luren. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IEEE Computational Intelligence Society

The article IEEE Computational Intelligence Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sub-group of notable organisation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 13:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm Normchou. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, CoronaVac, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Per the latest update of the RS: "While the latest disclosure provides a clearer indication of the vaccine’s efficacy, it wasn’t a complete picture." [1] Normchou ^💬 06:28, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]