User talk:Wpearl

Welcome!

Hello, Wpearl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Redirects

If you want to create a redirect you can click on the #R on the edit tool bar to get the correct mark up. Then you just need to complete between the crackets to say where the direct should go and voila. If I can help you further, please feel free to contact me by clicking on the humbug in my username and then editing my talk page to leave a message. Happy editing. --Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects / Edwaert Collier

You've created a new article Edwart Collier, found out that the article already existed under a different name Evert Collier and then changed the text of the old article to "redirect" to yours. This way the discussion page and the history of the article were lost, while the old article also contained stuff that's not in your text (for example the three references). The thing to do in such a situation is to merge your text in the old article (you may even overwrite it) and then move the article to the new name, if you think that's better. Unfortunately, you used a name that he's basically not known by (24 google hits only should have given you a hint). The Dutch art-historical database (http://www.rkd.nl/rkddb/) says that the preferred name is "Edwaert Collier" (4540 hits), but commonly seen is "Evert Collier" (Evert informal for Edwaert) (5870 hits, partially thanks to wikipedia of course), while "Edwaert Colyer" gives 2140 hits. Of course, the Anglicized form "Edward" pops up a lot too (2240 times for Edward Colyer & Collier combined), though he wouldn't have used that himself. I suggest you revert your redirect in "Evert Collier", merge your text in that article, rename it to "Edwaert Collier" and redirect "Edwart Collier" to "Edwaert Collier". Afasmit 04:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the Evert Collier thing for you

I added a link to the painter from the Buccanneers page. Its appropriate to have a dull page disambiguation for this as there are only two and one is as also know as. A link from the article of Edward Collier is therefore the correct way to go. I'm going to review the redirect you put in and will probably reverse it but your link will remain.

Please remember to sign your name at the end of your talk page messages by adding 4 ~~~~ at the end. That makes it possible to know who said what when.

Best Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel H. Kress

Thanks for the additions to the article Samuel H. Kress. The list of museums with collections donated by Kress is very useful. However, when you edit in the future please be careful not to destroy all the wikilinks that appear in an article's text. The Kress article probably had too many (it's not important to wikilink individual years, for example), but your recent edit removed all of the article's wikilinks, including some that are standard for Wikipedia biographies, such as dates of birth and death, place of birth, and so on (I've restored the essentials to the article). I noticed that you've started a couple of biographies of artists. They will be welcome additions to the encyclopedia. If you haven't seen it yet, you might find it useful to visit WikiProject Biography. Whyaduck 06:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Frank Stella's 'Harran II', 1967.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Frank Stella's 'Harran II', 1967.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Hawaiian art

On Wikipedia we use lower case headings. Please see WP:MSH for more information. I'm also not clear why you deleted the American Art category. In the edit summary, I explained that this applies from the post-1898 period until the contemporary period. —Viriditas | Talk 04:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brett Weston's 'Dune Abstraction, 1969.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Brett Weston's 'Dune Abstraction, 1969.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brett Weston's 'Rock Forms, Pebble Beach, California, 1969.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Brett Weston's 'Rock Forms, Pebble Beach, California, 1969.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brett Weston's untitled (Tree Roots), 1973.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Brett Weston's untitled (Tree Roots), 1973.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Charles W. Bartlett's color woodblock print 'Amritsar', 1916.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Charles W. Bartlett's color woodblock print 'Amritsar', 1916.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 09:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Charles W. Bartlett's woodblock print 'Prayers at Sunset' (Udaipur, India), ca. 1919.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Charles W. Bartlett's woodblock print 'Prayers at Sunset' (Udaipur, India), ca. 1919.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josef Albers's painting 'Homage to the Square', 1965.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Josef Albers's painting 'Homage to the Square', 1965.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:14, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Mangold's acrylic and pencil 'X Within X Orange', 1981.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Mangold's acrylic and pencil 'X Within X Orange', 1981.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:32, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frank Stella's 'Harran II', 1967.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frank Stella's 'Harran II', 1967.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:33, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jasper Johns's 'Map', 1961.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jasper Johns's 'Map', 1961.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:35, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lyonel Feininger's painting Jesuiten III (Jesuits III), 1915.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lyonel Feininger's painting Jesuiten III (Jesuits III), 1915.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:David Howard Hitchcock's oil painting 'View Towards Honolulu'.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:David Howard Hitchcock's oil painting 'View Towards Honolulu'.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Mangold's acrylic and pencil 'X Within X Orange', 1981.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Mangold's acrylic and pencil 'X Within X Orange', 1981.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

File:Richard Diebenkorn's painting 'Ocean Park No.129'.jpg

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fairfield Porter's painting 'Under the Elms', 1971 - 1972.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fairfield Porter's painting 'Under the Elms', 1971 - 1972.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Mangold's acrylic and pencil 'X Within X Orange', 1981.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Mangold's acrylic and pencil 'X Within X Orange', 1981.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

File:Richard Diebenkorn's painting 'Ocean Park No.129'.jpg

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fairfield Porter's painting 'Under the Elms', 1971 - 1972.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fairfield Porter's painting 'Under the Elms', 1971 - 1972.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Mangold's acrylic and pencil 'X Within X Orange', 1981.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Mangold's acrylic and pencil 'X Within X Orange', 1981.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fairfield Porter's painting 'Under the Elms', 1971 - 1972.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fairfield Porter's painting 'Under the Elms', 1971 - 1972.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hans Hofmann's painting 'The Gate', 1959–60.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Max Beckmann's 'Self-portrait with Horn', 1938-1940.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Max Beckmann's 'Self-portrait with Horn', 1938-1940.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]