User talk:Yimingllewyn

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

/

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

|

Some random happenings.

Something strange has been happening. A user named User:Zubsnoob was blocked and has inflicted damage to my account. Apparently when someone is blocked, everyone on that IP address( whatever that is) is also blocked. Please help.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yimingllewyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know what is going on? Please help me and unblock my account! I did nothing wrong. yimingllewyn 05:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC))

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppetry via User:Zubsnoob. It's obvious that you created a vandalism-only account once your last edit was reverted. This edit, which was made from the same computer that Zubsnoob was using, is just too much of a coincidence. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you using public internet access or a shared network(such as at a university)? 331dot (talk) 10:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC) \[reply]

yesyimingllewyn 22:39, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yimingllewyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

yimingllewyn 06:12, 12 October 2019 (UTC)Um, hello? Maybe User:Zubsnoob was an account created by my brother. I alsked him and he said he quickly changed back into my Wikipedia (User:Yimingllewyn) account. I think he was the mastermind behind the Zubsnoob account. Adding to my previous statement, I will describe how my brother secretly made the Zubsnoob account. So when I was going down to the shops, my brother snuck into my room and tried to make me annoyed. I left my Wikipedia account on and he logged off. He then signed and made the account you know know as Zubsnoob. He then wrote abusive content and as I came home, he quickly signed into my account (He knows my username and I also saved my account for 365 days on that device) and he changed back to avoid suspicion. Please unblock me. My brother is ashamed for his actions.yimingllewyn 06:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thanks for letting us know your account was compromised. As per WP:COMPROMISED, it is no longer eligible for unblock consideration. Yamla (talk) 10:26, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just so you know, it is standard practice to indefinitely block accounts that have been left unsecured, so if that is true, you will likely not be unblocked. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:10, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I left my account to be signed in just because I might forget my password.yimingllewyn 06:19, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

I have now put a password to my computer so my brother cannot access it. I have also changed my Wikipedia password. Please unblock me. I enjoyed editing Wikipedia and it was fun to edit and make mistakes and fix them up again. Please UNBLOCK me. Please, I am begging you.yimingllewyn 06:16, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

We have no way of knowing if we are talking to you or your brother, or if it it was you or your brother who made the inappropriate edits. (see WP:BROTHER) Compromised accounts are not unblocked under any circumstances. In addition, if all you want to do is have "fun" making intentional mistakes and removing them, you need to remain blocked to protect Wikipedia from your fooling around. It is clear that you and your brother lack the level of maturity needed to be able to contribute here. 331dot (talk) 10:42, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When i mean having fun, I mean learning how to write on Wikipedia and its strcit guidelines. Even I do not know how to make my guidelines. Anyway, my brother doesn't know my password so how would he be on this account right now? What kind of proof would you want me to send????? I didn't compromise accounts with my brother. If you see my edits, the majority of them are not fooling around. I sometimes make errors when doing new signals. Sometimes I still do not know if it is The Great Barrier Reef or Great Barrier Reef. So please make my block smaller. I have contributed to Wikipedia with over 350 notable edits. Please let me continue with my peaceful editing and leave me alone.Yimingllewyn 23:15, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Compromised accounts are not unblocked. You may read WP:COMPROMISED for information on how you can resume editing. 331dot (talk) 23:20, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by compromised accounts?Yimingllewyn 06:57, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Anyway, it doesn't say.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yimingllewyn (talk • contribs)

Read WP:COMPROMISED and Wikipedia:Compromised accounts The Mirror Cracked (talk) 07:23, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You state that your brother accessed your account and used it while you left it unsecured. That is the definition of a compromised account. We now have no way to know who is operating this account, you or your brother. Your brother could have changed the password and be pretending to be you. In addition, even if you are you, the fact that you leave your account unsecured means that this account must remain blocked to protect Wikipedia from the chance that you will leave it unsecured in the future for your brother or someone else to use to damage Wikipedia. If you read the pages indicated, they will describe how you can resume editing and what you should do to better secure your account. At least this is only your Wikipedia account and not your bank account. Use this as a learning experience. 331dot (talk) 10:18, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will try to get back into editing, remembering to sign out of my account. Thanks.Yimingllewyn 05:06, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Archived Stuff

Border's Battlers moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Border's Battlers, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 07:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Yimingllewyn/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Yimingllewyn/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:50, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yimingllewyn! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:50, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails to meet WP:NBOOK criteria. Consider merging into Michael Sexton instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Yimingllewyn/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Yimingllewyn/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note about my Sandbox

Safe Curb Charmer, please merge the page border's battlers to Michael sexton please. Thanks yimingllewyn 09:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello. This is to prove i am yimingllewyn.

{{Commited identity|1eb00f7cdeaa38f5e9aec8f065b956acf94d416a4a40c1fb5d1dd23b857ba6fe|Yimingllewyn|background=#FC9|border=#000}}

How do I make a committed identity. More proof that I am me: I wrote that my favourite player was Edin Džeko and I also acquired a player named thibaut Courtois. I also mentioned that I caught see-urchins and I also have a tower of wikiboxes table. I also mentioned that duckduckgo is a scam.

Committed identity: 1eb00f7cdeaa38f5e9aec8f065b956acf94d416a4a40c1fb5d1dd23b857ba6fe is a SHA-256 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

This is for 311 Dot.cbfe64f1f418374e061a066412fbab7d6f6779b03556561bc26d11a9cd55d1be

I am 331dot. That only would prove that you are the person who posted the above committed identity at the time you posted it. It doesn't prove you have been the only one to use this account since it was created, since you have admitted someone else has used it. As you have been told, compromised accounts are not unblocked. You have been told how you can resume editing, by following the instructions at WP:COMPROMISED to establish a new account elsewhere and immediately identify it as a successor to this account. If you post here again asking to be unblocked, I will remove your ability to edit this page. 331dot (talk) 07:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 331dot. This is my new account. Here, I am going to edit Wikipedia well. Please do not block me as I have changed my password and set a password to my computer. LlewynYiming (talk) 07:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of World of Aviation

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page World of Aviation has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a company, corporation or organization that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Guy (help!) 13:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Border's Battlers concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Border's Battlers, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Border's Battlers

Hello, Yimingllewyn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Border's Battlers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 14:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]