User talk:Kizule

Welcome!

Hi, Zoranzoki21. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 14:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Local copies of files

Please respect the Template:Keep local markings on files when requesting deletion of files that have been copied to Commons. SpinningSpark 21:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dabfix on Dorsum

So because of your edit to Dorsum I've implemented a feature to remind users to keep descriptions terse per MOS:DABENTRY. Please clean it up. — Dispenser 18:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Komentari

Drago mi je da ti je istekla blokada, bilo je potpuno nepotrebno, naravno rasprave su prošlost. Učinili su mi uslugu na neki način, više neću raditi nove članke na srpskoj vikipediji, neću raditi na portalima, kao ni patroliranje i ostale izmene koje su u cilju održavanja vikipedije. I onako će se pojaviti studenti i novi korisnici koji će to uraditi. Jedino ću se fokusirati na članke koje sam ja uradio, ali i to vrlo malo. Izbegavaj rasprave i uživaj. Sve najbolje i hvala za podršku.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 12:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zoranzoki21. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page move discussion

As I am sure you want an answer to your question on this page, the rule against canvassing is found at WP:Canvassing. That guideline also points to other helpful pages, for example, the link to WP:Disruptive editing, which the blocked editor did by both canvassing and by bludgeoning that discussion. There's really no defense for all that – you might think there is, but there isn't. In debate discussions, editors try to build consensus; however, there are rules to this process that we are all expected to follow. The blocked editor did not seem to be interested in following the rules, to the detriment of other editors in that debate. Paine Ellsworth ^put'r there 16:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Paine Ellsworth: Thank you for reply! Zoranzoki21 (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasure! Paine

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kizule (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but I have global right on metawiki for IP block exception. Zoranzoki21 (talk) 23:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to tell us the IP in question to evaluate the block. You can find it via a website like http://www.WhatIsMyIP.org/. If you do not want to publish your IP address here, you can use UTRS to let us know privately. Global IP block exemption only works for global blocks, not for local ones. Huon (talk) 09:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Kizule (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22803 was submitted on Sep 29, 2018 12:48:56. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:48, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zoranzoki21. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page FEM. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Please see WP:DABACRO before adding lots of articles/bios that do not use the acro in the article (title/alt name) [1] Widefox; talk 14:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello Kizule. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kizule. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kizule|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

I'm not paid for any edits on Wikimedia Foundation's projects. Best regards! Kizule (talk) 06:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello, Kizule. It seems that you've done two COI edits up-to-date. I would like you to comply with Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use (see WP:PAID and disclose your COI on your userpage before editing articles like Jared Madere and Miyu Nagaoka. If this doesn't settles here then I've to bring this to WP:COIN unfortunately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.243.19.83 (talk) 06:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not paid for any edits. I'm aware of your attacks. Kizule (talk) 06:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kemi Filani Blog moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kemi Filani Blog, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:15, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kemi Filani Blog (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kemi Filani Blog and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kemi Filani Blog, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kizule! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chiddie Anyasodo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chiddie Anyasodo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 13:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I got confused here, as I've created that page in the Draft namespace, but I saw that someone else made edits and moved it out of the draft namespace, then you moved it back into the draft.

Thank you for your understanding! Kizule (talk) 17:36, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Chiddie Anyasodo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Chiddie Anyasodo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 19:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.174.89.81.141 (talk) 01:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GeneralNotability (talk) 00:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kizule (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I think that this block isn't necessary, especially indefinite one. I know rules, as I'm an administrator on another wiki, and thing which makes me happy is that you have very clear rules. I'm not paid for edits, I'm doing it voluntarily as asked by person in interest. I won't make such edits in the future if you aren't happy with it, and I'm open for discussion always. In hope that you will unblock me, I wish you all the best. Best regards, Kizule (talk) 09:28, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you've been repeatedly asked on this page, you'll need to explain clearly and in full and transparent detail how you came to make inappropriate edits such as those at Draft:Chiddie Anyasodo. You'll understand that, without that explanation, the only possible conclusion we can draw is that this was undisclosed paid editing in violation of the Wikimedia Terms of Use, and so the block should stand. I'm declining your request. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:58, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please explain what you mean by I'm doing it voluntarily as asked by person in interest. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I mean "I was doing it", no that I'm doing it. My phone has corrected my typing incorrectly. Kizule (talk) 13:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was not the central part of my question. Who is the "person in interest" and what did they "ask" you to do? --Blablubbs (talk) 13:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You could probably help clear some of this up @Kizule if you explained where exactly you were asked (per your unblock request) by the person "in interest". I'm not an administrator but I think the community would like to hear about this. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like that administrators were in hurry to block me. In that case, I'm fine with block. Best regards! Kizule (talk) 19:32, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A non-answer isn't really ideal since it violates the TOU. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kemi Filani Blog

Hello, Kizule. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kemi Filani Blog, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kemi Filani Blog

Hello, Kizule. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kemi Filani Blog".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kizule (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to use this opportunity to request unblocking my user account. I'm not going to do any kind of edits for which I was blocked. Only typofixes and such minor edits, which I find, while I'm editing pages on Serbian Wikipedia, which is my main wiki, and where I'm an administrator. Thank you for your understanding, and I'm hoping that my request will be fullfilled this time. Kizule (talk) 15:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You still need to honestly answer the questions posed earlier. Until you do that, there is no pathway forward. 331dot (talk) 06:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nobody cares that you are an admin somewhere else. You were blocked for violating wmf:TOU, for which you still have not been honest. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman: For which edits I'm blocked exactly? Can you provide me diffs? Kizule (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[2][3][4][5] plus some now-deleted edits. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]