Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATS Infrastructure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the topic is substantially covered by multiple reliable sources. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ATS Infrastructure

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are two sources about routine announcements of funding but not enough to satisfy WP:NCORP. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:10, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:10, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:10, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The page is outdated with few references, but a quick Google News search shows that there are actually quite a few sources available with updated information. The page simply needs a rewrite. Gargleafg (talk) 23:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Will be best if such said sources are listed here to be observed and analysed by everyone. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Multiple sources available including one from Forbes India https://www.forbesindia.com/article/real-estate-special/ats-infrastructure-building-on-trust/43163/1.Jackattack1597 (talk) 16:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly WP:BEFORE was not followed. In peeking through the google news link above, there is enough RS to meet WP:SIGCOV and WP:NCORP.4meter4 (talk) 04:55, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.