Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aahil Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aahil Khan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable model/actor; draftification is impossible due to a previous attempt of this nature being draftified under the same name. Google search only pulls up the same ToI tabloidy junk under a role byline as is already in the article and no actual significant coverage Zimidar (talk) 01:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, (talk) 01:016, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Times of India, Zee news and NDTV are good source. Filmography is also seems good.--AAonlyA (talk) 21:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Need more RS, no credit given to this artist in most of the shows....not passing WP:NACTOR Worldiswide (talk) 04:14, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 21:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 21:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The Patrika source used is green per sourcebot, so it's ok. There is more than enough in Gnews to build an article, literally page after page of hits. RS are in there. Oaktree b (talk) 23:26, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.