Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absolute (Time-Life album)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America1000 17:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Absolute (Time-Life album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't find any significant coverage. Not even one review. Non-notable album. SL93 (talk) 23:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: it does have one review at least, the AllMusic review already in the article. Richard3120 (talk) 23:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Richard3120 I read a few editors say that Allmusic isn't a reliable source. I'm not so sure about that, but I didn't mention the review just in case. SL93 (talk) 23:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: I found another review. I will leave it to others to decide if a paragraph review from Allmusic and Billboard are enough. SL93 (talk) 23:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 09:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Keep: Source 1 in the article and the Billboard review indicated above seem reliable. All I found is a mention of the album's entry to the Billboard 200. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 15:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- Mmm, the fact it reached no. 73 on the Billboard 200 might be enough to keep this. Although I rarely see the point in articles for compilation albums – apart from a chart position, there's no substantial prose you can write about a bunch of previously released songs. Richard3120 (talk) 16:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.