Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achronolate
Appearance
lame! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.176.65.171 (talk) 09:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
The result was delete. No real need for AFD in obvious cases like this. Friday (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Zero Ghits. Original research, protologism, no reliable sources. nneonneo talk 16:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
lame! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.176.65.171 (talk) 09:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]