Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aesop And Son
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show#Supporting features. MBisanz talk 02:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Aesop And Son (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
There is currently an AFD going on for Bullwinkle's Corner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) listed for being a "segment of a show does not meets the criteria for inclusion." Upon investigating The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show I noticed that this has an identical problem. I suggest Merge into the show's article Valley2city 19:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- AfD is not for merge discussions. Consider taking this to article's talk page or target article's talk page. In fact, considering that the article has only one contributor, boldly redirect it yourself, explain the redirect to the creator and move on. LeaveSleaves 17:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you LeaveSleaves, and on that note I change to Delete. There is very little content and the entire thing would have to be rewritten anyway to be viable. It just has a similar situation with Bullwinkle's Corner (same author) and therefore I felt it belonged in AFD. I decided against joining the AFDs because they are slightly different. I want to note that I suggested to the creator of the page, BuddyBoy600, that he should edit the main page of The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show because his expertise seems to be on the show. Valley2city 18:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
*The idea of deleting this seems to be uncontroversial and because it is such a new and short two sentence article therefore I am changing this to a Prod. Could an Admin please close this Afd which I have proposed? Thanks Valley2city 18:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- (edit conflict) Okay, but have you considered redirecting right away or is there some protest from the creator to this? Because noticing comments on the other AfD, I think when it comes to this one, most might !vote the same way here. As you pointed out there, Aesop and Son already redirects to show article, why not this? Doing that would certainly save your time and would solve the situation easily. LeaveSleaves 18:23, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point. I'm going to put it back to AfD and see what happens as the creator finally voiced some objection on his talk page which merits AfD. Valley2city 20:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to The_Adventures_of_Rocky_and_Bullwinkle_and_Friends_(TV_Series)#Supporting_features. Gsearch isn't turning up individual notability for this (all mentions I found are in discussions of TAoRaBaF); all material in this article is already in the section. Redirects are cheap, so don't delete.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: non-notable show segment. JamesBurns (talk) 03:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show#Supporting features. No individual notability can be found. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — neuro(talk) 00:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show#Supporting features. This was a minor segment of the series. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Hiding T 13:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep in this case. Rocky and Bullwinkle is an odd duck of a show, in that it had both its own recurring plot and a gallery of shorts, some featuring the title characters, some not. To my mind the actual Rocky and Bullwinkle material should be contained in the show article. But in this case, the situation seems to me analagous to Merry Melodies or Looney Tunes where recurring characters are not treated as subsections of the overall series. Phil Sandifer (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
