Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Album Network RAWK 7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 06:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Album Network RAWK 7

Not really sure about this one, WP:MUSIC does not make it clear about whether that notability policy pertains to compilation albums or not. A few possibly notable bands are on the album, but the fact a good chunk of the bands represented, almost all the track titles, as well as the album's distrubtor are redlinked and there is no independent coverage, references, assertion of notability (or sources for that matter) and the author's assertion that this was created "From my record collection" makes me think this is we could apply WP:MUSIC and call it NN. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 18:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 22:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp (talk) 00:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No assertion of notability for the album from nn label. A one sentence article with a track list. Delete B.Wind (talk) 01:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Some notable acts, but a few too many red links and no real reviews to speak of. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't meet the notability standard of WP:MUSIC. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 02:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would say that a compilation album, no matter how major the artists, is not, in itself, notable unless it meets WP:N and/or WP:MUSIC in its own right and this album doesn't seem to do so. OlenWhitaker • ^{talk to me} or _don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 18:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.