Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliv Samson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 07:17, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Alliv Samson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
She certainly exists, but I can't find sufficient independent RS coverage to conclude that she is notable. Tagged for notability for over a year. Created by a one-edit-only-ever SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 04:13, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - MrX 05:15, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; I'm not finding coverage in reliable sources for this person, either. She does not appear to meet WP:CREATIVE at this time. Gong show 05:38, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:47, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The subject does not appear to meet WP:BASIC to qualify for a standalone Wikipedia article. Several customized source searches in GNews and GBooks are not providing any coverage in third-party reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nothing in the media here to meet WP:BASIC, not yet notable. NealeFamily (talk) 03:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable.--Staberinde (talk) 10:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
