Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Americanism in the United States

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Anti-Americanism --JForget 01:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Americanism in the United States

This is a partisan rant posing as an article. Nothing is said here that is not, or cannot be, said better in the Anti-Americanism article. This is unreferenced as well, which is strange, because there are plenty of sources for Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and Glenn Beck, amongst others, calling people anti-American. Overall, just pointless. Delete and redirect to Anti-Americanism. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 04:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Pretty clearly original research. I wouldn't go so far as to call it a rant, as it pretty clearly lays out that this is the opinion of some right-wing news media figures. Don't redirect; it's not really talking about Anti-Americanism in general, but specifically referring to a sort of fifth column operating from within the States itself. Then again, from what I've read over at Conservapedia, this fifth column might be operating within Wikipedia. :-) eaolson (talk) 05:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per above. guyzero | talk 05:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Anti-Americanism is a good option -- ¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/My edits} 06:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Anti-Americanism, could be a section there if necessary. GregorB (talk) 09:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete and no redirect. From the intro "Conservative commentators such as Bill O'Reilly believe there is a contingent of anti-Americanism in the United States..." and guess who's in it... Michael Moore, Al Franken, and other anti-Americans. Besides making an article about someone's opinion, I don't believe that Bill O'Reilly has actually accused Moore, or Franken, or others who disagree with him as being "Anti-American". I suspect that the the article's author might have inferred that. But even if O'Reilly has voiced this opinion, civilized people don't label persons on the basis of what a political commentator might say. And I think O'Reilly and Limbaugh and Moore and Franken would be among the first to say that those who disagree with them aren't anti-American. Mandsford (talk) 13:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete and no redirect per nomination and Mandsford. --Pleasantville (talk) 18:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Anti-Americanism, the article's current subject matter is irrelevant when considering whether a page should be a redirect. Jeodesic (talk) 22:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So who's going to type in "Anti-Americanism in the United States" or "Anti-Americanism in the United States of America" when they can just type in "Anti-Americanism"? It's a redirect that nobody will actually use. Mandsford (talk) 23:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible that very few people will use it, but that doen't negate the point I was making. Jeodesic (talk) 22:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, doing a redirect (because "redirects are cheap") isn't much different than a reward. Mandsford (talk) 18:31, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly biased.Dr.orfannkyl (talk) 16:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete per nom., and others.--JayJasper (talk) 21:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.