Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banktivity
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Banktivity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Software with references to either passing mentions on a list, interviews, or unreliable sources, falling short of WP:NSOFT. A preliminary WP:BEFORE didn't unearth much more than press releases. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 19:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 20:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 20:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Mac Life and Macworld reviews look like good RS, I´m leaning to keep. Pavlor (talk) 10:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- The Macworld article doesn't even mention the subject. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 18:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- From the lead: Banktivity, formerly known as iBank . Pavlor (talk) 19:33, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- The Macworld article doesn't even mention the subject. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 18:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep It passed WP:NSOFT. Not much in the way of promotion, just a nice wee article. Copyedit needed. scope_creepTalk 10:53, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep A notable piece of Mac software that changed its name - however there is plenty of coverage: Macworld article cited aboveReview from independent evaluator AIII 2012 review Forbes mentionAlasdairEdits (talk) 21:03, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.