Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Qualtrough

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Valoem ^talk ^contrib 23:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Qualtrough

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional character on a show that was barley in it. Wgolf (talk) 23:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 02:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 02:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 02:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Character played a significant role in series 7. He had less screen time than Connie, but both were involved in the Sugar Horse subplot which was a significant part of that series.Autarch (talk) 22:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

merge to List of Spooks characters. The significance of the character to primary sources is irrelevant, we need significant coverage from secondary sources independent of the subject per the WP:GNG to build a fact-based encyclopedia, not a fan Wikia. I haven't thoroughly investigated, but my reasoning likely applies to several other peripheral Spooks characters with independent articles. --Animalparty-- (talk) 21:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — kikichugirl ^oh hello! 05:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge' per Animalparty. Boleyn (talk) 18:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.