Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big icon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:32, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Big icon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by User talk:Vinaygurung2 who has now been banned for what was essentially a WP:IDHT approach to his dauntless writing of articles on unref'd, non-notable local subjects that were invariably speedied. This article on a radio programme escaped such a fate by making some claim to notability but nothing has been found to establish the necessary. Plutonium27 (talk) 21:56, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010(talk) 09:32, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - One "reference" is merely a link to another Wikipedia article that does not support this article. The other is just an online advertisement. There does not appear to be any notability.--Rpclod (talk) 01:07, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.