Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Embrace

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 July 30.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 08:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Embrace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable per WP:BAND. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources, just some blog interviews. OnionRing (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 09:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 09:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello OnionRing, Allmusic.com I consider a verified resource, please check their wiki [[1]] to be listed at their database you need to have some notability, also Artist Direct [[2]] requests some degree of notability to be included at their database not many resources online are because this particular band does not grant interviews, very few available nor pictures, MTV Networks is owned by Viacom band is listed as well I also consider a reliable source WP:Reliable sources, also they are listed at "POLLSTAR" which is a trade publication for the concert tour industry in which they gather information from professional agents, managers and promoters who produce concerts [[3]] following link not posted at the article Blue Embrace \ Pollstar, Thank you for your help in this article!TarotRecs (talk) 17:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you editing on behalf of Tarot Records, Blue Embrace's record label? If so, then you should not be editing an article on which you have a WP:Conflict of interest. Thanks, OnionRing (talk) 17:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not represent Tarot Records, my account is new and when i created that login that was what it came to my mind, per your suggestion in my page i requested a change in the username so there is no confusion, all information gathered are from internet source that is public and available TarotRecs (talk) 18:31, 30 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:36, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Page arranged and fixed as requested by other members, this page it is complaint to be added to wikipedia and not to be deleted, sources are VERIFIED and CREDIBLE, including a major media outlet in rock (Blabbermouth), famous Journalists (Denise Ames), Famous and legendary Musicians such as Ex Black Sabbath , DIO members (Carmine Appice, Vinny Appice) with notable and public reputation between several other famous sources also added Spell26 (talk) 22:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This looks like it has a consensus already please check "Once discussion is closed, please place on talk page: {{Old AfD multi|page=Blue Embrace|date=29 June 2016|result=keep""Medit16 (talk) 03:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Well, Spell26's comment reeks of promotion, and allmusic isn't close to a reliable source. Also, see WP:CON, as many totally legitimate accounts have !voted here. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Allmusic is a reliable source as shown in this list of albums reliable sources at the top of this page [4] however just a listing isn't enough for notability there needs to be a biography written by staff.which like most groups this group doesn't have so extra sources are needed. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)21:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)21:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note: Spell and Medit are socks, and TarotRecs is the same account (rename) as Medit. Socks blocked and AFD semi-protected. Courcelles (talk) 04:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist; all the commenters seem to have a WP:COI or are socks (or both); could we please have some policy based arguments Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources and no other criteria of WP:BAND is claimed to be satisfied. Blogs are not reliable. Interviews are not independent. Directory/discography entries are not significant. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:39, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Like the other non-sockpuppets, I'm not seeing any reliable sources beyond the (less-than-reliable) blogosphere. A G-search turns up the usual top-listed culprits of non-notable relentless self-promoters: the band's website, its Facebook page, its Allmusic page, its Twitter page, its YouTube page, its SoundCloud page, its Vevo page ... Ravenswing 06:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.