Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartoon Network's Big Pick
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Cartoon_Network_Original_Series_and_Movies. Black Kite (t) (c) 11:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cartoon Network's Big Pick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely unsorced, this article has no citations, no sources. Fails meet the notability. JJ98 (Talk) 02:05, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. JJ98 (Talk) 02:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Cartoon Network Original Series and Movies. Some animation showcases are considered notable if they've been on television for years (Oh Yeah! Cartoons comes to mind, remember watching that as a kid), but since this one was on for such a short while, a redirect would be appropriate.--hkr Laozi speak 16:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lingering Cartoon Network cruft from 2004 which has escaped scrutiny until now. With only two successful projects out of 14 (a 14% success rate) it's obvious the notability hasn't stayed around over the years, and there aren't any sources for this at all. Nate • (chatter) 06:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Two out of forteen is hardly bad, considering the context. Usually, for animation showcases, or any showcases for television pilots, none of the shows get picked up. The fact that the showcase spawned two successful series is impressive. While I agree that it shouldn't be kept as a separate article, a redirect would be a much more viable option then simply deleting it. --hkr Laozi speak 12:32, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JJ98 (Talk) 18:54, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Cartoon Network Original Series and Movies as a valid search term. The content of this article is unsourced, and thus fails Wikipedia:Verifiability, so I would not be opposed to a delete and redirect. Cunard (talk) 09:08, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.