Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children's Holiday Venture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Holiday Venture

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No demonstration of notability. Cannot find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Kioj156 (talk) 16:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 24. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:22, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:45, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:45, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Refs don't support notability. EmyRussell (talk) 13:11, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Minimal content and refs do not meet WP:GNG. DaveApter (talk) 14:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - only primary sources, not notable. L293D (☎ • ✎) 00:46, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.