Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiropractic in Canada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 01:30, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chiropractic in Canada

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage of the countrywide industry in reliable, secondary sources to demonstrate that this passes WP:GNG. Article history is poor enough and the history rife enough with copyvio, that WP:TNT would apply even if this scraped by on notability. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Medicine, and Canada. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and try to improve the article more before calling it a lost cause. Here's one possible source. There are 9,000 Chiropractors in Canada- that seems notable on its own. Otherwise, some basic things can be incorporated in to the main chiropractic article. ScienceFlyer (talk) 04:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete there arent any other country-specific Chiropractic articles that I could find and reading the article I am not convinced there is a need for one. The article needs to be nuked, currently has statements such as "Canadian accrediting standards are higher than the United States" which are sourced from a statement made by Jean Moss, the president of a Canadian chiropracter organization in front of the Ontario legislature. It seems there is not much to salvage here. --hroest 19:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:58, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As it stands now the article fails WP:RELIABLE and doesn't pass WP:GNG. It's also worth noting that the article had serious WP:COPYVIO. I would be inclined to try and save this article is there articles for other countries but I don't see anything like that here. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 20:08, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.