Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cover Up (pricing game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cover Up (pricing game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, unsourced article. Adequately covered in List of The Price Is Right pricing games. Google search results in only YouTube links and fansites plus one link to the official site. Sottolacqua (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per ever-growing precedent that TPIR's pricing games are not notable. This one has not proven to be the subject of any reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete as per WP:N and also per TenPoundHammer's reasoning. This article is also unsourced and we also have the game covered in the list as per Sottolacqua's reasons. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No third-party sources to verify the notability of this game - in fact no sources at all. Delete per nom. feydey (talk) 10:21, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.