Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dacta soos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G3: blatant hoax) by Yunshui (talk · contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiDan61 (talk • contribs) 12:45, February 20, 2013‎ (UTC)

Dacta soos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not for something made up one day. No indications anywhere that this "fictional character" has appeared anywhere other than the imagination of this page's author. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This article was nominated for deletion 8 minutes after its creation. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Question How long does it take to determine that an article like this doesn't belong? I came close to nominating it for speedy deletion as blatant vandalism, but I didn't think that category quite fit. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Although I'm usually hesitant in deleting articles nominated for deletion early and created by newer editors, this one is blatantly non-notable. It could have been speedied for G3, I guess. Zero hits on Google. There is simply no indication that this subject even exists. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unknown to the world. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete as non-notable junk. No need to wait seven days. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete As an obvious hoax. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete I've nominated for CSD. Mkdw ^talk 09:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - It's a second attempt of blatant vandalism, see Dact_soos. Toffanin (talk) 09:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.