Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagon James
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Coredesat 04:25, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can't find any reliable sources to establish subject's notability; seems to fail WP:BIO. Jfire (talk) 06:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 04:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 02:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete one role in a nn, unreviewed movie. JJL (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of notability, as I've checked the subscription-only newspaper database for his name with no relevant hits. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 02:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - a minor appearance in a documentary does not constitute notability. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 02:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notice of this AfD has been left for WikiProjects Arts, Film and Music. Pairadox (talk) 02:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete doesn't pass BIO in re film appearance(s). SkierRMH (talk) 04:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Why did this have to be relisted? I mean, sometimes things have been removed simply because only the nominator thinks so, and there have been no objections, no comment to the nomination at all. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 14:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply: It was relisted because no one commented one way or another, of course. Ravenswing 21:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable, minor appearances in documentary are not notable. --Solumeiras (talk) 14:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
