Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damir Kedžo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Saša, Tin i Kedžo. Significant coverage has been claimed but not actually demonstrated. The band is an appropriate target for a redirect; if the band happens to be deleted in the future, this redirect can be deleted without further ado. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Damir Kedžo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual, fails WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC. A weak claim of notability is the reality show and the now-disbanded band, which have their own articles anyway. Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:23, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Saša, Tin i Kedžo. The band itself arguably meets WP:MUSIC criterion #7 as "the first Croatian boy band". GregorB (talk) 09:10, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Well known and notable Croatian singer. Has significant coverage in Croatia which meets the guidelines for inclusion. Iftelse (talk) 16:25, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Um, this would still be a WP:LOTSOFSOURCES problem but you didn't actually demonstrate any significant coverage! Put some in the article, otherwise the argument boils down to WP:BUTITEXISTS. (If you can copy&paste your non-arguments, I can do the same with my retort. :p) --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:37, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:N and WP:ENTERTAINER. Without demonstrable significant coverage, also cannot meet the needs of WP:BLP and there fore should be deleted. Considered merge, but Saša, Tin i Kedžo suffers from the same problem and nothing from this article that can be merged at it is all unsourced. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 23:28, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, there's no evidence of notability independent of the TV or band, both of which already have articles. And it's an unreferenced BLP, which by itself is a good reason for deletion. Yilloslime ^T_C 04:57, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.