Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Demola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

David Demola

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability questioned. Does not appear to have significant, widespread coverage in independent sources. Wkharrisjr (talk) 20:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Coverage appears to be mostly his own books and clones of this article. Fails WP:N. -- 202.124.72.26 (talk) 09:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 04:11, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. If information contained herein is questionable, get the subject involved himself to contribute to or confirm data on his bio page. David Demola is well-known enough as a public figure in Christian circles (e.g. his programming on Trinity Broadcasting Network, Daystar) to easily reach. Does not fail WP:N. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liberal4ever4u (talk • contribs) 17:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 21:00, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete I simply do not see the sources. There are a few fugitive book references, but they do no better than attach him to his congregation and place him within a particular movement. Web searches are filled with directory information and hits on his own site or places where he has preached. All of the concrete information I can find other than the prosperity theology stuff is surely taken from his own website, and the theological criticism stuff is a significant BLP issue given that it's something of an editor synthesis of the the movement in general and the few fugitive linkages I was able to find. Mangoe (talk) 22:48, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This article fails Notability specific criteria for people and also fails GNG, also publishing books do not instantly confers notability. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 12:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.