Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayna Hart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dayna Hart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was tagged with BLP proposed deletion but the tag was (correctly) removed after the addition of sources. But those references are not what we're looking for since they only address the subject indirectly (for instance an ad in which she appears, an IMDb cast in which she is listed or an interview in which she doesn't even appear on cam because she's the interviewer and not the interviewee). In the end, I don't think she meets the requirements of WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Pichpich (talk) 20:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While I agree that the article as it stands is not what we are looking for and the sources are not what we need to meet notability standards, it looks to me at first glance that there are a good number of articles in the media on this individual. I think that we're down to an "editing" issue and not a "deletion" issue.--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point to sources that discuss Mrs Hart and her career directly and in sufficient depth to build a short but solidly sourced article? I could not but you seem to imply that I'm blind. Surely you don't consider the current sources as anywhere near sufficient so where is your alternative? Pichpich (talk) 18:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Comparing her to Entertainer's notability standards is somewhat unfair as some of her publicity is her as a reporter, not an entertainer. Per Paul McDonald on general notability. --Mr. Guye (talk) 01:35, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Paul McDonald - It needs fixing/rewriting not deleting. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 15:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She started an on-line magazine that is not yet notable, and she acted in one independent film. That is not notability. The other stuff has no sourcing at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.