Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die Hard films on television

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Let me know if anyone wnats the content for a merge. Courcelles (talk) 01:27, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Die Hard films on television

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article covers how the films were altered to be shown to television audiences. This appears trivial to indicate how vulgar language is censored and violence is cut back to meet television viewing requirements. This article could spawn similar articles for other film franchises, which seems unnecessary as many films are altered in some way when shown on television (especially if it differs by network, time of day, or by country). If there is significant differences that are notable for a film altered to be shown in other mediums, then it can be briefly covered in a single section within the film article(s). I would recommend any notable differences be incorporated into the Die Hard (franchise) article. Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:42, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge to Die Hard (franchise). Unnecessary content fork. Erpert (let's talk about it) 00:17, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very pointless trivia of random differences in the various films broadcast - all films are modified for broadcast for varous reason and there is nothing at all noteworthy about it unless such alterations actually have significant coverage. Like most, these do not and Wikipedia does not need to host such an unnotable bit of trivia -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:40, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per arguments above. Note that the same thing happened to Rambo films on television, James Bond films on television and other similar articles. Films are edited/formatted for TV for many reasons, this is just unnecessary, unsourceable trivia (IMDB and some blogs are not reliable sources).--70.80.234.196 (talk) 04:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is a trivia list. If there was anything specifically out of the ordinary about the editting for televiosn, the a merge would be appropriate, but I don't see that here. -- Whpq (talk) 18:50, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.