Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doorly
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:47, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Doorly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable dubstep artist. Ridernyc (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. He's produced remixes for a good range of notable musicians, and is rather well-known for a dubstep artist. The article needs vast improvement, but I don't think that's a reason for deletion. Esteffect (talk) 01:45, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability isn't inherited. Some sources do say that he produced for these artists, but they say no more about him. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:14, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- no notability demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. N2e (talk) 00:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.