Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durwin Dean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.-Wafulz (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Durwin Dean

Delete nn local DJ. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete: this is a hoax. Dwilso 19:16, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If he is in fact a DJ for this station, they don't think he's important enough to list on their site.--Fabrictramp (talk) 22:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Further comment. Looks like he was a DJ for the station in 2006 [1], but it's unclear if he still is. He does have a page on the station's web site, but he's no where in the current programming listings. He got a quick nod from the Baltimore City Council, but that is the full extent of any notability in a gsearch.--Fabrictramp (talk) 22:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, per nom. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's clearly not a hoax but it is a poorly formatted stub of a non-notable local disc jockey from a single-purpose account whose name ("magicmusicfan") is too close to "Magic 95.9" (Dean's station) for coincidence to be at work here. Dean had been the subject of some coverage (here when he was robbed, here when he was promoted, etc.) but only enough to prove existence, not notability. - Dravecky (talk) 22:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update I've done quite a bit of formatting and fix-up to this stub plus added a relevant reference. My opinion hasn't changed but unless some enterprising editor were to beef this up with significant references and a proof of notability then, well, at least this stub will die pretty. - Dravecky (talk) 17:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not a hoax [2] but also not notable. Fails WP:BIO.--Rtphokie (talk) 01:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cannot find any verifiable source that asserts meeting WP:BIO Dloh cierekim 02:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — The subject of the article clearly exists. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 15:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How is that reason enough to keep the article?--Atlan (talk) 17:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You've used that cut-and-paste answer for a few in AfD that, in fact, didn't exist, Kurt. Care to cite the basis for your belief? Ravenswing 19:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not a notable DJ by the looks of it.--Atlan (talk) 17:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.