Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edge Fog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G12 by INeverCry (talk · contribs). Non-admin closure of deleted article. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:32, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edge Fog

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know if this should be incorporated into an article on film development or should be removed from this project and placed in wiki dictionary. Jab843 (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; create Wiktionary entry. Not notable enough to merit a WP article. A Wiktionary entry is probably the best option. dci | TALK 19:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge this one and light leak to Stray light per WP:PRESERVE. The source shows verifiability, but there's no evidence of notability. Diego (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'd normally agree with Diego's recommendation, but the article looks like a direct copyright violation of the quoted reference The Filmmaker's Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide for the Digital Age. There's nothing legal to merge, but perhaps a summary could be made on the Stray light page. --Mark viking (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.