Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filemobile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:46, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Filemobile

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was authored in 2010 with disclosure given that interested parties had created the article. The article is primarily supported with outdated company "press releases." The company is an entrepreneurial endeavor that has gone through several reorganisations and renamings. The current name seems to be newspark.io. There is nothing to suggest to me that the company was notable and thus this non-encyclopedia article (marketing) has never been updated. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 20:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't find any sources, other than archived listings that use this "service". Oaktree b (talk) 21:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Adding searches for later names below. AllyD (talk) 09:17, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Crowdspark: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

New Spark: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Delete: Originally posted as a COI article setting out the company's origins and business proposition at 2010. The company's inclusion in various lists around that time would now fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Articles on the acquiring company Newzulu were twice speedy-deleted as promotional [1] so that doesn't provide an WP:ATD target. Whether under its earlier or current ownership or business propositions, I am not seeing evidence that the firm has attained notabilty. AllyD (talk) 09:38, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.