Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finis Valorum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep with a strong recommendation to merge the contents. As an ordinary-editor action, I have redirected the pages to List of minor Star Wars characters. Anyone with interest and knowledge may pull content from the respective pagehistories in order to merge any useful content. Rossami (talk) 19:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finis Valorum

The following minor characters also included in this AfD:

All are minor characters which could be merged into a list of characters (several already exist). No sources which confirm notability are to be found, and the entirety of the pages are in-universe. Fails WP:FICT. 'Nuff said. David Fuchs^(talk) 20:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Condense and Merge with List of minor Star Wars characters (although that article has problems since it's completely unsourced). None of these characters are notable enough for their own articles. TJ Spyke 20:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all into a "minor characters in Star Wars" article. Tonight must be Star Wars cleanup night. -- Redfarmer (talk) 20:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I'll move on over to some other fictional worlds if I have time. This AfD spree brought to you by WP:TWINKLE. ;p David Fuchs^(talk) 20:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 21:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am very confused: is this a deletion proposal or a merge proposal? If the latter, then this should never have been brought to an AfD. To quote many anon, "AfD is not cleanup." In any case, as the nominator says, these would do well to be merged (into List of minor Star Wars characters probably) per the guidelines in WP:FICT. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge While not notable enough for a stand-alone entry, this information is still of interest and should not be completely deleted. I would think that a proposal for merger would have been more appropriate than a proposal for deletion.--Jeff Johnston (talk) 14:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as the articles all fail WP:NOT#PLOT and there are no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside the Star Wars canon. --Gavin Collins (talk) 14:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all as these characters appear in films, comic, cards, action figures, games, etc. They are easily verifiable, recognizable, and notable. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. They all fail WP:NOT#PLOT and WP:FICT. Doctorfluffy (talk) 19:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or delete per nom --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 21:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep These are minor characters in terms of screen time, true. Their actions are significant to the story, however, and should be kept. Treybien 8:30 7 January 2007 —Preceding comment was added at 04:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

I made some edits to the Shmi Skwalker article and I hope it's works according to Wikipedia guidelines. -Gillian Reed (talk) 13:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]