Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Hurst

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. apparent consensus. 3 clear deltes are enough to make it unnecessary to relist. DGG ( talk ) 01:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Hurst

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A local news anchor with no apparent claim to notability outside the two areas where he has anchored. The Devil's Advocate (talk) 07:03, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete On paper, an anchor who has worked in two major markets (NYC and Houston) would be an easy keep. But I'm not finding any sources on the specific awards he's won. There may be an article here, but this isn't it. HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 20:48, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find any independent sourcing covering the subject. Not seeing anything to backup the "award-winning" bit, either, unless he is not a prominent TV news anchor and is, in fact, an outstanding Monitronics manager. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 04:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 22:31, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.