Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Spencer (Psych)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. If someone wants to redirect after deletion go for it. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Spencer (Psych)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is very little notable coverage of this character from sources not affiliated with the character. The one source that does is much more of a passing mention. Maxx-♥ talk and coffee ☕ 13:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Maxx-♥ talk and coffee ☕ 13:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Well just based on the sources in the article I would be a !delete, but others might find some sources. Conyo14 (talk) 17:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From my search, there is only part of a book that gives him any mention, and that is Arp's Psych and Philosophy. However, it is far from being enough to warrant a stand-alone page. Maxx-♥ talk and coffee ☕ 20:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Books are definitely better than website articles in my opinion. However...

Delete per nom. I couldn't find any WP:SIGCOV aside from the occasional recap. Although I am open to changing it if someone finds more. Conyo14 (talk) 21:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Poorly referenced, no analysis/reception, just "characterization" (but see my first point). Fails GNG as written. Ping me if better sources are found. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Piotrus. Not enough reception in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 03:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.