Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Benardo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Benardo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have to question the notability of this so-called phenomenon. He was on two reality shows two years ago and hasn't caught the public's eye since. It's time for him to go.TheNate (talk) 03:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: seems to be a case of fifteen minutes of fame. Brief appearances acting silly do not count for notability. I would also have to say that "internet phenomenon" is quite an overstatement. –ArmadniGeneral (talk • contribs) 04:37, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 12:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The criterion at WP:REALITY has not achieved consensus but even if it did, I don't think this individual truly qualifies as a contestant. In fact, his brief notoriety is more like WP:BLP1E. Accounting4Taste:talk 16:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.