Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Shunsuke Sato

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Shunsuke Sato

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article Issac Shunsuke Sato was nominated for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Issac_Shunsuke_Sato) but was speedily deleted under G7, probably because the author blanked it to create this article which is virtually identical, but with the name spelled differently. The same problems apply: Searches find absolutely no RS that verify either the content of the article or the notability of this person. I fear some elements may be fabricated. The article contains seven "sources," none of which help verify the main elements of article. #1 does not even mention the individual. Two does, but it is not an independent RS and only might confirm he is vice principal of some business college in Nepal, itself not inherently notable. #3 is now delinked but originally it was his Facebook page. Sources 4 to 7 are odd in that they are about subjects totally irrelevant to the individual in question and seem tacked on: #4 is about the architecture of the Diet Building; #5 is about changes in government structure in Japan in the 2000s; #6 is a book about recent Japanese documentary; and #7 is actually a fiction film based on Yukio Mishima. None confirm his relation to Cambridge or the Anglican Church--or help us understand how he is supposedly "one of the leaders in the field of academia within the Anglican community." Note that on the former talk page, the editor who started the page admitted he/she is an employee of this person. There are thus serious WP:COI issues. Clearly fails WP:GNG. Should be speedily deleted, but an editor declined CSD. Michitaro (talk) 00:45, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Michitaro (talk) 16:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - if he really was (or had been) a bishop then he would be notable, but zero non-WP ghits suggests a possible hoax. St Anselm (talk) 00:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete -- one of the links indicates that he is Vice-Principal of Central College of Business Management in Nepal, on which we have no article. That also indicates he is "Revd". The link to him being a bishop is a Facebook page which is not RS. The Vice-Principal of a Tertiary college might merit keeping as an ACADEMIC, but I would expect there to be a WP page on the college first. Not a pure HOAX, but NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:18, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find reliable sources.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:38, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.