Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabelle Earnshaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:07, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isabelle Earnshaw

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a pair of articles about two sisters who played the part of an infant on a television miniseries. Because baby acting can't really be considered "acting" per se, I don't believe that this fulfills the notability guideline for entertainers. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:58, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Delete. Notability not established in either article. Cindamuse (talk) 08:51, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as both article fail notability criteria for actors. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 11:23, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. - Why wasn't it already speedied under A7 within minutes of it s creation?--Kudpung (talk) 15:53, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Because asserting a film role is an "indication of importance". However, yes... the assertion fails. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:28, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete x 2 - Baby actors with one career role? Carrite (talk) 16:30, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both as waaaaaaaaay WP:TOOSOON. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:28, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- no notability demonstrated in a reliable secondary source. N2e (talk) 00:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.