Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javier Gomez Durand
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete There is one source that appears reliable; this does not rise to the level of WP:BIO, as indicated below. Xoloz 22:03, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Javier Gomez Durand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I am not convinced that this person meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. There are sources, but none of them are the kinds of articles about the subject that are called for by WP:RS. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The person in this article is notable in the IT comunity as well as in Puerto Rico. As the author/editor of several IT books he has certain recognition in that field. I believe the references are from notable sources like Microsoft web page and O'Reilly Publisher website (largest technical book publisher in the USA). Mocotechochi 17:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Mocotechochi[reply]
- Reply What you need, to show notability, is actual articles written about this person, in newspapers and magazines for example, or reviews of his book in nontrivial sources. You've verified that he exists, but not that he is important. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I agree with mocotechochi... he might not be famous as Paris Hilton, but he is notable in his field. I added the two times I have seen somebody else talk about him. I can probably scan the CB article, how can we upload that? 70.45.149.21 10:46, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Sources are not sufficient to indicate notability. Doctorfluffy 22:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. None of the sources are independent, and thus do not satisfy Wikipedia:Notability. --SmokeyJoe 09:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
