Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karthik S Kumar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted. Materialscientist (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Karthik S Kumar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article about a young actor that I think fails WP:ENT. Based on this edit, it can be assumed that the article has been written by the subject. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 10:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I've noticed that the following has been added by an IP to the talk page of this AFD:
please delete this article...its violating the rules.....he is not achieved anything in life.just acted in tele serial nothing else..if it is like that each and everyone can crate a there profile in wiki.....please dont break the rules..... by 170.251.155.50 @ 12:04, 16 February 2015‎
Call it coincidence, but it just happened to be posted five minutes before a brand new user effectively blanked the article with these four edits. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 00:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.