Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Wiglesworth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Kelly Wiglesworth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Her only claim to fame is that she was on Survivor, which isn't notable in its own rights because of WP:1E. Tavix (talk) 00:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I'd say that all of the Survivor season 1 contestants are notable, because that really was a TV phenomena. Wigglesworth, in particular, received plenty of coverage in reliable sources for several years after her appearance on the show. She also hosted a show on E! at one point, adding to her notability. See 2 of 26. Zagalejo^^^ 02:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops, I spelled her name wrong in my Google News search. Still got 57 hits, but here are the proper search results. Zagalejo^^^ 02:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Runner up in S1 of Survivor and E! show host makes her just notable enough. Nate • (chatter) 09:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge With article on "Survivor." Being a runner-up contestant on a reality show barely qualifies as notability, and the subject's post-"Survivor" activities are not notable. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just remember that season 1 of "Survivor" was not a typical reality show. At the time, the finale was the 11th most-watched TV series episode in US history. [1]. Zagalejo^^^ 18:24, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep As noted by Nate, the post-Survivor tv show hosting business crosses the bar for inclusion. Miami33139 (talk) 01:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
