Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knud Olsen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Copyright-violative material removed. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a near-copyvio of this, using a few changed words and altered bits to get out of it. It's not direct, so thats why I brought it here. thoughts? -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as copyvio. Changing a few words here and there is not sufficient. The text is fundamentally a clone of a copyrighted work, and would require a complete rewrite. Resolute 04:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I agree, but I wasn't entirely sure. Know what I mean? -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - per nom. Bleach, copyvio. --Hirohisat Talk 06:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If I understand the above correctly the nomination for deletion is due to perceived copyright violation. If so I can get permission from the OK Dinghy International Association for the text to be used. Please confirm that the only reason for the delete nomination is copyright. Thanks. Boatman 07:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, what needs to be done is to write it in your own words. --Malcolmxl5 08:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I should clarify. Yes, the issue was one of copyright violation. What needs to be done is to write the article in your own words. --Malcolmxl5 08:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and speedy close I have reduced the article to a stub to remove the copyright violation. The article can now be rebuilt using your own words. I invite speedy close as the reason for the nomination no longer exists. --Malcolmxl5 08:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
