Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kresnt
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Kresnt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
YouTube hip hop artist does not pass WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Chetsford (talk) 04:08, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 13:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 13:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing stated here passes any WP:NMUSIC criterion, and the sources are not reliable ones for the purposes of getting him over WP:GNG in lieu. The only source that isn't a complete non-starter in terms of establishing notability is Complex, but even that one's just a blurb which is not substantive enough to carry him over GNG all by itself as the article's only valid source. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when he has a stronger notability claim, and a better range of solid sources for it, than this. Bearcat (talk) 16:45, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. No RS found, fails
[[WP:MUSICBIO]]
as well as[[WP:GNG]]
/[[WP:BASIC]]
. Sam Sailor 17:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.