Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's Do This (website)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 14:19, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let's Do This (website)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I went to PROD this article with a WP:G11 promotional tag but it had already been declined by another user. This is a startup which has gotten some celebrity investors, the article as written fails WP:PROMO, I'm also not sure the sources provided pass WP:NCORP, as all this is at the moment is a startup with the normal startup-y press, and I couldn't find other types of sources online (there was one on CNBC which was similar to the Forbes piece.) SportingFlyer T·C 06:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 06:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 07:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I tried to G11 but it was rejected. No more CSD's for me. The article fails WP:NCORP. It has some coverage due to the celeb investor's that are backing it, but at the end it is another startup, whose coverage is dependent on the fame of it celebs, not the fact it itself is famous or even notable. scope_creep^Talk 13:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. As Scope creep said, the company's only claim to notability appears to be inherited from the athletes that invested in it. No independent significant coverage, not enough to base a NPOV and non-promotional article off of. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 14:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.