Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil iROCC Williams
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 01:24, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Lil iROCC Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Very short article. Only notable for charting in Billboard. Tasco 0 01:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: not relevant, but the creator quickly started adding information after the speedy deletion tag was added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tasco 0 (talk • contribs) 01:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I dislike rap and try to avoid religious music as much as possible, but having a record on the Billboard charts and being a nominee for a major industry award certainly makes one notable. The article also includes third party sources on the subject. I fail to see how this was even considered as an AfD. Kinston eagle 01:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Article meets WP:MUSIC on three points: charting, award & inclusion in a compilation. The article may be brief, but it's certainly long enough to provide full context and enough information for inclusion. --Moonriddengirl 02:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, despite my hatred of rap and Christian music, the Billboard charting and award nominations are enough on their own, not to mention the many good sources cited. Oh, and the article's well written to boot. J Milburn 18:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.