Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizzy the Lezzy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Everyone is satisfied with the references found, and so am I. Non-admin closing. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 04:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Lizzy the Lezzy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. While this character seems to generate a lot of interest in the blogosphere, I haven't been able to locate a reliable source to establish its notability. Delete unless such sources can be found. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the following significant coverage in reliable independent sources: Metro Weekly, Haaretz.com, Yagg (in French). News searches also generate potentially relevant foreign-language coverage. - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:21, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Metro Weekly reference only qualifies as trivial. However, the other two might be just what it would take to save the article. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:37, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 03:06, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 03:07, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. SilverserenC 19:32, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. SilverserenC 19:32, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The specific coverage in the sources is more than enough to satisfy notability for this article. I have formatted the references and added in the ones listed above, per DustFormsWords. SilverserenC 19:32, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. In addition to the sources noted by DustFormsWords and [User:Silver seren|Silver seren]], the article mentions coverage on Logo TV and in Curve, both of which would attest to notability for an LGBT topic. --Arxiloxos (talk) 22:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
